arXiv preprint ·
Concordance Plausibility Check for Intervention-Conditioned Human Digital Twins
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Intervention-conditioned human digital twins predict treatment alternatives that cannot be observed in the same patient. Ordinary predictive accuracy therefore cannot establish counterfactual credibility. We propose the Concordance Plausibility Check (CPC), a claim-centered framework combining real-world evidence, qualified simulation and clinical knowledge. CPC matches evidence to the causal claim, audits contradictions and shared dependencies, and reports Pass, Fail or reason-coded Indeterminate.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Screening LLM Judges Without Ground Truth: A Preliminary Evaluation of an AI Dental Hygiene Coach
Stable Signer V3: 4D Deformable Primitive Splatting Is All You Need for Sign Language Production
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
Means-Ends Analysis Helps LLMs Plan in Continuous-State Domains
FlashRT-PAI: Fast Kernels Are Not Fast Pipelines for Physical AI Inference
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.