arXiv preprint ·
DKnown-Jev: Fine-Tuning and Evaluation of a JEV-Style Model for Tasks Involving Normative Knowledge
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Tasks involving normative knowledge include concept interpretation, eligibility determination, procedure explanation, material requirements, and service-outcome assessment, all of which require rules and facts published, maintained, or recorded by authorized entities. Whether a candidate paragraph can answer a question therefore depends on applicability and answer completeness as well as topical relevance. We develop DKnown-Jev to classify the normative usability of candidate paragraphs into two classes. The 2B and 27B configurations are fine-tuned directly from the native Qwen3.5-2B and Qwen3.8-27B base models, respectively. The models combine question conditions, article metadata, and paragraph content, adopt the classes Answer Evidence (AE) and Non-answer Evidence (NE), and undergo domain adaptation using human-verified training data. Five configurations are evaluated on the same test set of 1,120 human-verified examples. DKnown-Jev 27B trained for one epoch achieves the highest accuracy of 98.75% and macro-F1 of 98.60%, exceeding Jev by 6.07 and 6.76 percentage points, respectively. DKnown-Jev 2B trained for one epoch achieves 92.86% accuracy and 92.18% macro-F1, the best aggregate results among the tested 2B configurations. Its gains over Jev are 0.18 and 0.33 percentage points on this test set, corresponding to only two additional correct predictions, which is insufficient to establish a stable advantage. The 27B one-epoch, 27B two-epoch, and 2B one-epoch configurations all exceed Jev on both metrics on this test set. Class-level analysis shows that the 27B two-epoch configuration has the highest AE recall, while the 27B one-epoch configuration has the highest NE recall. This study provides practical and empirical evidence for developing and applying candidate-scoring models to tasks involving normative knowledge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Screening LLM Judges Without Ground Truth: A Preliminary Evaluation of an AI Dental Hygiene Coach
Stable Signer V3: 4D Deformable Primitive Splatting Is All You Need for Sign Language Production
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
Means-Ends Analysis Helps LLMs Plan in Continuous-State Domains
FlashRT-PAI: Fast Kernels Are Not Fast Pipelines for Physical AI Inference
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.