arXiv preprint ·
Unbounded Losses, Unchecked Inputs: Measuring the Safeguards of LLM Options-Trading Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents now place options orders at retail brokers, and developers publish open-source options agents faster than anyone has examined them. Prior security work on trading agents scored academic equities designs by whether an attacker can flip a buy-or-sell decision. We present the first measurement of the options agents that brokers and developers ship, scored by the safeguards they enforce and by the worst loss their documented order paths can reach. We screened 765 GitHub repositories, broker documentation, and the research literature and found 215 eligible repositories and 8 broker-native agent interfaces. We then scored 26 systems, including every broker interface and every open-source project with at least 20 stars, on seven robustness and eleven security safeguards with cell-level evidence. The ecosystem is new: 198 of the 215 repositories were created in 2026, and 129 (60.0%) appeared in the two weeks around one options-trading hackathon. Of the 22 systems that can place orders, 10 enforce a pre-trade limit outside the model, yet none of the 26 authenticate their text sources or cross-check market data. Of the 26, 17 can execute with no mandatory human step and 13 can reach unbounded loss, including 6 of the 8 broker interfaces. Because an attacker who writes the agent's inputs can move an order's strike, expiry, volatility, and legs while its direction stays correct, options agents need loss limits enforced at the order boundary.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Veil-Then-Reveal: Protecting PII Privacy via Reversible Pseudo-Anonymization in Zero-Trust User--LLM Interaction
Can Agents Keep Secrets They Were Never Told? Benchmarking Latent Privacy Risks Across Sessions with MemJoin
Watermarkability: Measuring and Improving Language-Model Compatibility with Logit-Based Watermarks
Defending Against Dormant Poisoning Attacks Across Language and Multimodal Agents
Identify, Classify, Act: Per-Instruction Controlled Compliance for LLMs over External Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.