arXiv preprint ·
Can This LLM Annotate My Data? Estimating Zero-Shot LLM Performance
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in annotation tasks with varying success. While several studies have demonstrated the opportunities and shortcomings of LLMs for annotation, a critical question remains unanswered: is it possible to predict how well they will perform on a new dataset? To answer this and related questions, we construct two task families which induce 461 text classification datasets. We find that it is possible to predict LLM performance - to a certain degree - and that contrary to other work which highlights the usefulness of LLM verbalizations of self-confidence, internal log-probabilities are the most predictive signal.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Harness-Policy Optimization
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
Prune the Leaky Neurons: Mitigating Private Data Leakage in Fine-Tuned LLMs via Joint-Embedding-Guided Pruning
FlashMap: Flow Map Speculative Decoding
Causal Latent Workspaces for Looped Transformers
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.