arXiv preprint ·

Margin Certificates for Voting Classifiers under Mixing Dependence

Adria Binte Habib and Ibne Farabi Shihab

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningStatistics TheoryMachine Learning (Statistics)

Abstract

Margin bounds explain why weighted votes generalize after training error vanishes, but dependent observations require concentration arguments that keep the dependence model and failure budget explicit. We study stationary mixing streams without treating dependence as a formal substitution of an "effective sample size." For a finite base class, we combine independent-block Rademacher theory for stationary $β$-mixing processes with a clipped margin loss to obtain an explicit uniform voting-margin certificate, whose dependence penalty is set by the number of approximately independent blocks and the coupling budget $4(μ-1)β(a)$. A black-box transfer theorem shows that any i.i.d. voting-margin guarantee remains valid on a regularly spaced subsequence, with only an additive $β$-mixing failure probability. For votes fixed independently of a stationary finite-state reversible Markov stream, spectral concentration gives the cleaner $\sqrt{t_{rel}/n}$ rate, and a sticky-refresh construction shows this exponent is unavoidable. The constant is statistic-specific: the effective sample size is $n/τ_{int}(g)$, with $τ_{int}(g) \le 2t_{rel}-1$. When the dependence scale is unknown, a batch-means Student-t interval is valid up to an explicit remainder vanishing in the number of batches, with width governed by $τ_{int}(g)$ rather than the worst-case $t_{rel}$. Experiments show: the learned-vote certificate is nonvacuous once the block count is large; a two-timescale construction gives a batch-means interval 8.1x narrower than the worst-case interval at nominal coverage (0.945); block-bootstrap and batch-means intervals undercover under strong dependence while the certificate stays valid; and on real, ordered UCI HAR sensor data the dependence-agnostic certificate reaches 0.95 coverage where naive intervals reach only 0.38.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics