arXiv preprint ·

Visual Causal-chain Bookmarking: Retrieval-Weighted Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning from Delayed Reward

Prathap Selvakumar

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

RL agents trained on a single trajectory-level return face a credit-assignment problem: when a reward arrives many steps after the decision that caused it, every action gets the same signal regardless of causal responsibility. This paper studies Visual Causal-chain Bookmarking (VCBM), which concentrates credit on the decision points that determine an episode's return, via two instantiations. The first targets a fully observed, low-dimensional MDP (a delayed-reward watch-repair task), where VCBM statistically discovers which state components the agent causally controls and estimates per-decision-point action values directly, evaluated against ground truth and RUDDER, an LSTM-based baseline. VCBM converges to 95.07% correct decisions in a mean of 1,532.3 episodes across 20 seeds, versus RUDDER's slower, more variable convergence (mean 3,327.1 episodes; p<0.001); VCBM's discovered causal structure exactly matches ground truth in all seeds. The second targets a partially observed, language-based setting: an LLM agent trained with Leave-One-Out PPO (LOOP) in AppWorld, where causal discovery is intractable and a structural heuristic (state-mutating tool calls) substitutes for it, with credit distributed via retrieval over episodic memory and blended with LOOP's advantage. Over 200 iterations on identical Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct/LoRA/FSDP2 configurations, VCBM-blended LOOP improves task success over plain LOOP (0.354 vs. 0.458), reduces final-step max importance weight, and improves token efficiency, with a small KL exception favouring LOOP. The watch-repair result supports the claim that weighting causally relevant steps is more sample-efficient than an undifferentiated baseline or a learned return-redistribution network; the AppWorld result, limited to one seed per arm by a 2-GPU budget, is a compute-limited demonstration at a harder, natural-language scale, not a statistical confirmation.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics