arXiv preprint ·
ENFR: Evidence Networks with Flow-Matched References for Amortized Simulation-Based Model Inference
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The evidence, $\mathcal{Z} = p(x | \mathcal{M})$, of a data-generating model $\mathcal{M}$ is a powerful tool in Bayesian frameworks: it enables model inference, model misspecification tests, and goodness-of-fit assessment as an alternative to standard discrepancy statistics, e.g. $χ^2$. While versatile, the evidence is notoriously difficult to compute, even when the likelihood is available. In both likelihood-based and simulation-based inference, estimating $\mathcal{Z}$ provides an immediate solution to high-dimensional goodness-of-fit or model misspecification tests: using $\mathcal{Z}(x)$ as the test statistic induces a minimum-volume level-$α$ test. Such tests are essential to assess model fidelity, which is necessary to trust simulation-based parameter inference. Existing learned approaches largely target Bayes factors, which only measure evidence ratios. Instead, we provide accurate, fast, and amortized estimates of the absolute evidence. We present ENFR: Evidence Networks with Flow-matched References. Building on the Evidence Network framework of Jeffrey & Wandelt (2024), the proposed method first learns Bayes factors with respect to a flow-matched reference, from which the absolute evidence is recovered. We show improvement in estimation of $\mathcal{Z}$ over the flow-based baseline in all applications considered and the best performance of all density estimation methods considered in our benchmarks. We furthermore introduce and provide the proof for an architecture that jointly learns the individual evidences of a set of models $\{\mathcal{M}_i\}$. We demonstrate the performance and scaling behavior of these approaches on data from a variety of scientific applications.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
Analytic and numerical study of dark matter halos in the Horndeski theory
Galactic warps constrain equivalence-principle violation in the dark sector
How bright can a galaxy be? Extreme value predictions for high-redshift survey observables
Searching for lensed gravitational waves with unlensed templates
Inferring the delay time distribution of type Ia supernovae with CAALAM I: SED modelling choices and their effect on the delay time distribution
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.