arXiv preprint ·
Explainable Machine Learning Analysis of Temperature Effects on Mechanical Strength of Fiber-Reinforced High-Performance Concrete
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23811
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Predicting Concrete Strength Under Heat
The authors compare eight machine-learning models using 1,204 experimental records and find that gradient boosting and extreme gradient boosting perform best on unseen data, both reaching an R² of 0.903. They use SHAP and partial dependence analysis to explain the predictions, identify temperature as the leading influence, and package the top models in a Python-based graphical interface.
What they found: Across eight models evaluated on 1,204 experimental records, gradient boosting and extreme gradient boosting both achieved an R² of 0.903 on unseen data. Gradient boosting recorded the lowest RMSE at 6.67 MPa, while extreme gradient boosting had the lowest MAE at 3.97 MPa and MAPE at 10.60%.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Predicting the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced high-performance concrete subjected to temperature exposure is challenging because to the intricate interdependencies of mixture composition, fiber properties, curing conditions, and temperature. A data-driven framework to predict compressive strength utilizing 1,204 experimental records containing a diverse array of material designs and exposure situations. This study evaluates eight machine-learning models and demonstrate that ensemble approaches routinely surpass individual learners. Both gradient boosting and extreme gradient boosting exhibit superior performance on unseen data, each attaining a R^2 of 0.903. Gradient boosting produces the minimal root mean square error (6.67 MPa), whereas extreme gradient boosting achieves the lowest mean absolute error (3.97 MPa) and mean absolute percentage error (10.60%). The models are further interpreted utilizing Shapley additive explanations and partial dependence analysis, which reveal temperature as the primary factor influencing compressive strength, succeeded by fine aggregate, superplasticizer, cement content, water-to-binder ratio, and water content. Strength diminishes significantly with rising temperature, albeit the extent of deterioration is contingent upon the specific combination design. The best performing models are subsequently implemented in a Python-based graphical user interface for expedited prediction. Our findings offer a precise and comprehensible methodology for evaluating temperature-dependent compressive strength and facilitate the practical, data-driven design of fiber-reinforced high-performance concrete.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Shape-Aware Neural Time Fields for Rigid-Body Motion and Manipulation Planning
Power-Law Correlations Without Apparent Temperature-Tuned Criticality in Fixed-Tree Hierarchical Languages
Acquisition Function-Guided Generation for Bayesian Optimization over Discrete Spaces
Uniform convergence at optimal rate and scale
One Communicator, Three Vendors: Extending the MoA Predictive Theory to a Real NVIDIA+AMD+CPU MPI Ensemble
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.