arXiv preprint ·
How Many, but How Sure? Class Competition as a Confidence Proxy in Multi-Class Density-Based Counting
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-class density estimators can count objects in crowded scenes, but their class-wise outputs offer no indication of how reliably density mass has been allocated. We introduce a training-free confidence proxy based on local competition between the strongest class channels. The resulting prominence measure requires only the predicted density maps, with no retraining or access to model internals. We test whether residual competition is diagnostic of cross-class leakage by attenuating contested density at inference time. On DSACA predictions for the Hicks et al. dataset, this reduces overall MAE from 0.920 to 0.846, suggesting that class competition contains useful information about count reliability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Shape-Aware Neural Time Fields for Rigid-Body Motion and Manipulation Planning
Power-Law Correlations Without Apparent Temperature-Tuned Criticality in Fixed-Tree Hierarchical Languages
Acquisition Function-Guided Generation for Bayesian Optimization over Discrete Spaces
Uniform convergence at optimal rate and scale
One Communicator, Three Vendors: Extending the MoA Predictive Theory to a Real NVIDIA+AMD+CPU MPI Ensemble
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.