arXiv preprint ·
Not Every Mention Is a Claim: Rethinking Object Hallucination Detection in Vision-Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Object hallucination in vision-language models (VLMs) is usually measured by checking each object a caption names against the image. Most benchmarks and detectors alike treat every object mention as a claim that the object is present. This assumption fails when a caption names an object without asserting it, as in "a bench for people to sit on", which mentions people without claiming that any are in the image. We call such mentions non-assertive. Treating them as hallucinations inflates the error rates attributed to models that use such language. To separate them from real hallucinations, we introduce NAME-Bench (Non-Assertive Mention Evaluation Benchmark), 25,497 object mentions from captions that five VLMs generate for COCO images. Each mention is labelled concrete (asserted and present), hallucinated (asserted and absent), or non-assertive, and non-assertive mentions are further divided into four subtypes: depictive, purpose, negation and hedged. All the hallucination detectors that we evaluate flag non-assertive mentions as hallucinations, at rates between 14% and 80%. Adding non-assertive mentions to detector training as negatives largely corrects this on LLaVA-1.5. On the four newer VLMs, a comparable correction takes five to ten times more data, and the detectors then catch fewer real hallucinations. These findings show that current detectors conflate mentioning an object with asserting it, and that this conflation is harder to undo on the four newer VLMs than on LLaVA-1.5. Hallucination evaluation should therefore separate what a caption asserts from what it merely mentions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Harness-Policy Optimization
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
Prune the Leaky Neurons: Mitigating Private Data Leakage in Fine-Tuned LLMs via Joint-Embedding-Guided Pruning
FlashMap: Flow Map Speculative Decoding
Causal Latent Workspaces for Looped Transformers
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.