arXiv preprint ·
Language Models Learn to Improve Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate AI research, including language-model (LM) development, offering a potential path toward recursive self-improvement. However, turning experimental feedback into a learned ability to propose effective improvements across models faces two challenges. First, training such an ability with real feedback is expensive: reinforcement learning (RL) requires evaluating tens of thousands of proposals, each potentially requiring a full model-training run. Even at ten GPU-hours per run, reward collection alone would consume hundreds of thousands of GPU-hours, motivating a cheaper surrogate. Second, surrogate feedback can become unreliable as policy optimization favors overestimated proposals when the proposal distribution shifts. To address these challenges, we propose LM2LM, which trains LLMs with RL to generate effective LM improvement proposals. To provide scalable feedback, we use a research world model (RWM), a frozen LLM that predicts proposal gains from real experimental records provided in context, as the reward model for RL. To maintain feedback reliability, we periodically execute current-policy proposals ranked highly by the RWM and add their measured outcomes to its context. Across eight autoregressive and diffusion LM development environments, real-execution evaluations on held-out tasks show that LM2LM enables Qwen3.8-27B to outperform GPT-6-sol, even when GPT-6-sol is given 300 real experimental records in context, while requiring 33% lower data-generation cost. LM2LM also generalizes to a model family unseen during training.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Harness-Policy Optimization
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
Prune the Leaky Neurons: Mitigating Private Data Leakage in Fine-Tuned LLMs via Joint-Embedding-Guided Pruning
FlashMap: Flow Map Speculative Decoding
Causal Latent Workspaces for Looped Transformers
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.