arXiv preprint ·
Adaptation of Computer Use Agents to New Software with User Manuals
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recent advances in multimodal foundation models have significantly improved the ability to operate real-world software through graphical user interfaces (GUIs) using visual observations and natural language instructions. However, maintaining strong performance on unseen applications remains challenging, as practical tasks often require long-horizon procedural knowledge and application-specific operation patterns. In addition, constructing executable tasks and collecting corresponding trajectories for training still heavily rely on human-annotated data, incurring substantial cost. In this paper, we propose MAGE (Manual-augmented computer use AGent Execution and learning), a framework that leverages user manuals as a scalable source of procedural knowledge to improve both inference and training. During execution, MAGE retrieves task-relevant manual content and uses a planner to generate explicit procedural guidance for CUAs. To further account for the discrepancies between manuals and actual GUI environments, such as version differences or user settings, MAGE also adapts the agent policy through environment interaction. During training, MAGE converts manuals into executable task-plan pairs and uses the plans to guide environment rollouts toward task-relevant states; the resulting trajectories are then used to optimize the policy without human-authored demonstrations. This unified design enables effective utilization of manuals for both task execution and training, reducing reliance on human-authored training data. Experimental results across six applications demonstrate improvements in task success rates over strong baselines, highlighting the effectiveness of manual-guided planning and policy adaptation in new software environments. We provide the code and reproduction scripts at https://github.com/ku-autoai/MAGE.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Between Spoilers and Guesswork: Avoiding Over-Specification in Coding Benchmarks
Screening LLM Judges Without Ground Truth: A Preliminary Evaluation of an AI Dental Hygiene Coach
StoBasket: Joint Upsell and Cross-Sell Optimization for Contribution Margin
What Matters for NVFP4 Training? A Comparative Study of Low-Precision Pretraining Recipes
When Can You Trust an Agent's Own Verifier? Stress-Testing Counterfactual Rationale Verification Under Search Pressure and Oracle Access
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.