arXiv preprint ·
ANCHOR: Audio-Visually Grounded Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Benchmark
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) perform well on audio-visual question answering, but correct answers do not necessarily imply that their stated reasoning is grounded in relevant perceptual evidence. Existing benchmarks mainly evaluate final-answer accuracy, offering limited insight into whether model-generated rationales correctly identify visual regions, temporal intervals, and audio events supporting predictions. We introduce ANCHOR, a benchmark and evaluation framework for measuring grounded-rationale alignment in multimodal reasoning, comprising 2,319 videos and 8,272 question-answer pairs with structured reasoning traces, temporal evidence, spatial bounding boxes, and salient audio cues, including a human-refined test set of 224 videos and 975 question-answer pairs. We separately measure answer correctness, hallucination, logical divergence, and conciseness, with direct spatial and temporal grounding measurements on a focused subset. Across the full benchmark, twelve contemporary MLLMs show a substantial alignment gap: models with comparable answer performance can differ markedly in whether their explanations are supported by annotated evidence. On a matched subset of 100 videos and 446 question-answer pairs, rankings remain highly stable across human-refined, Gemini-generated, and GPT-generated references (mean Pearson r=0.99), providing evidence against model-reference circularity within this subset. Grounding-cue ablations of three MLLMs on the full human-refined test set reveal a consistent modality hierarchy: removing video reduces accuracy by 38.4-41.8 points, while removing bounding boxes (3.2-7.7 points) and audio (4.2-5.6 points) causes smaller, complementary, model-dependent drops. These findings show answer-only evaluation obscures important grounding failures and position ANCHOR as a testbed for evaluating accurate and evidence-aligned audio-visual reasoning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Direct Conditional Parameterization for N-Dimensional Splatting
Hexagonal Basis Projectors for Model-Based Iterative CT Reconstruction
STRIDE: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Driving Edge Cases
GazeAgent: VLM-Guided Implicit Gaze Calibration from Egocentric Multimodal Behavior for AI Glasses
Replay Pruning and Few-Bit Integer Inference for Hardware-Efficient Speed-Sign Recognition
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.