arXiv preprint ·
Grounding Generative Verification in 3D Content
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and 3D generation have expanded 3D understanding and synthesis. However, beyond visual fidelity, task-specific correctness grounded in 3D evidence remains a major challenge. We argue that building reliable 3D systems requires not only stronger generation and reasoning, but also verification feedback that identifies unmet requirements and explains their violations, allowing systems to reflect on and refine their outputs. Such feedback must integrate multi-view observations and distinguish genuine inconsistencies from projection-dependent appearances. We make three contributions. First, we introduce 3DVerifierBench, a benchmark spanning 10 tasks that evaluates decisions, rejection explanations, and responses to controlled changes in specifications and candidates. A human study reveals a 21.6 percentage-point gap between humans and the strongest tested model, GPT-6 Astra, while explanation-aware analysis exposes weaknesses in rejection reliability. Second, we analyze verification across fine-grained factual categories, exposing errors in values and target binding. We develop a scalable pipeline combining multi-view fact extraction, controlled 3D editing, and native annotations to produce 14,126 training examples with contradiction explanations and linked counterfactuals. Third, we examine how verification could support 3D generation through candidate selection and recursive refinement. In human-labeled sixteen-candidate pools, oracle selection improves complete factual success from 26.7% to 90.0%. In a separate eight-input study, human-guided recursive refinement satisfies all seven requirements for every input, compared with three under parallel Oracle@8. Together, our benchmark, analysis, and data pipeline establish a foundation for models to reflect on 3D content through reliable verification feedback.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
RoPE-Flow: Monocular Vision-based Robot Pose Estimation via 2D Graph-Conditioned 3D Flow Matching
Direct Conditional Parameterization for N-Dimensional Splatting
SIEVE: Overcoming Topological Obstruction in Equivariant Self-Supervised Learning
STRIDE: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Driving Edge Cases
RoboCloth: A Large-Scale Real Cloth Material Dataset for Neural Reflectance Reconstruction
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.