arXiv preprint ·
Realization Divergence in Multi-Provider Quantum Computing: A Pre-Registered Study of What Survives Measurement
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Quantum programs pass through compilers, transpilers and vendor services before execution. However, the distance between what was written and what runs is rarely measured. We call this distance realization divergence: the observable difference in how an identical source circuit is realized and behaves across quantum software stacks. We report a hardware study across three vendors and four devices, combining pre-registered predictions with explicitly identified exploratory analyses and amendments. In a compilation experiment with assigned placement policies, embedding radius correlates with two-qubit overhead at Spearman 0.805, against 0.492 for circuit size. Under a fixed lowest-index policy, an eight-qubit Bernstein-Vazirani circuit exhibits greater execution divergence than a twelve-qubit circuit on IQM Emerald. The opposite ordering occurs on IQM Garnet. Both comparisons replicate across two repetitions with disjoint confidence intervals. These results support a placement-dependent explanation, without isolating individual hardware noise mechanisms. The same ordering inversion is absent on the all-to-all IonQ control. On Rigetti Cepheus, a follow-up using topology-aware native placement found no consistent advantage in correct-answer probability for either submission track, but did not establish equivalence between the tracks. Structural comparisons depend on metric weighting, placement and device generation. Provider interfaces also limit observability: Rigetti's supported-operation list remained unchanged across a device generation that replaced the native entangler. We classify silent interface failures in composed toolchains and identify checks at toolchain boundaries, connecting valid cross-provider comparisons with concrete software-quality practices.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Where the SRAM Goes: Per-Symbol Attribution of Static Memory in FreeRTOS-C and Embassy-Rust IoT Firmware on a 64 KB RISC-V Microcontroller
Between Spoilers and Guesswork: Avoiding Over-Specification in Coding Benchmarks
Skip the Compressor: Coding Agents Fix More Issues When They Pick Whole Files
No One-Size-Fits-All: Adaptive Code Editing with Feature-Based Strategy Selection
ToolBottleneckBench: Measuring Tool-Agent Performance under Controlled Pressures and Fixed Harness Budgets
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.