arXiv preprint ·
Pricing the Unprovable: Ambiguity, Turnstile Runs, and the Verifiability Discount in Crypto Protocols
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Privacy-preserving protocols can repair a vulnerability without establishing whether it was exploited beforehand, even when no theft is reported and aggregate supply is protected. We call the potential value reduction from this gap the verifiability discount. A turnstile model shows how early withdrawal can shift a possible shortfall to remaining holders and why credible evidence can become more valuable as exposure grows. We introduce VDISC, a reproducible framework that records reported loss, exposed value, public evidence, returns, and pool flows separately. It combines Orchard's staged disclosures with reconstructed on-chain flows, earlier Zcash cases, and a 40-event security panel. Orchard follows the predicted direction: market responses were muted after repair and supply assurance, while the largest negative return and aggregate shielded-pool net outflow aligned with the acknowledgment that past abuse could not be ruled out. These patterns are directional, not causal. Across events, market-cap-normalized reported loss and unresolved exposure overlap among the 38 events with a public loss figure (Pearson 0.86, Spearman 0.56), partly because exposure is often coded from the loss itself, so returns alone cannot distinguish reported loss from unresolved history. The findings motivate three candidate design priorities: produce privacy-compatible evidence about past states, limit the state exposed by a single flaw, and disclose residual uncertainty explicitly.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Trading & Market Microstructure
Amortized Neural Filtering for Calibrated Posteriors in Statistical Arbitrage
Momentum, Commentary Tone, and Earnings Surprise in LLM Financial Forecasts
Intraday Forecasting Ability and Liquidity Provision of Institutional Traders
How Well Do LLMs Perform in Peer Review? Evidence from Finance and Accounting
Uncertainty Quantification for Financial Foundation Models: A Survey
Get the few papers worth your time in Trading & Market Microstructure every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.