arXiv preprint ·
Do Agents Need a New Kind of Paper? SPRA: Structured Paper Representation for Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Scientific agents must connect research problems, methods, and findings dispersed through narrative articles. We introduce SPRA (Structured Paper Representation for Agents), a paper-level representation of persistent research objects and typed relations. Its empirical-AI profile organizes Problems, Contributions, Components, ExperimentSetups, Measures, and Findings for querying, traversal, and reuse. Selected paper-level citation relations record dependencies, component use, and comparisons with prior work; source locations support verification. We instantiate SPRA across more than one million AI papers, with 19.95 million research units and 24.07 million internal relations. Evaluations access SPRA through Schema-RAG with task evidence fixed before inference. Across seven subfields, SPRA improves source-conditioned scientific QA by 0.381/5 over passage retrieval while remaining close to Full Compact (0.078/5 lower on average). In directed cross-paper reasoning, qualification improves by 0.184/5 over passage retrieval; Top-5 synthesis shows mixed quality effects. Across all paired RQ2 tasks, including Top-5, input+output tokens decrease by 28.5% relative to passage retrieval and 95.3% relative to Full Compact. In idea generation, a 0.067-point lower Overall score than Full Compact accompanies 93.7% fewer input+output tokens. Together, these results support SPRA as a usable representation of scientific content and a foundation for research workflows that connect, inspect, and reuse paper-level research objects. The SPRA resource is accessible through the Sciverse scholarly-data platform.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Learning When to Think: Utility-Guided Adaptive Reasoning for Efficient Text Retrieval
Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Harness-Policy Optimization
INCONVENIENT: A Benchmark to Assess LLM Generalization Capabilities from Convenience Samples
Prune the Leaky Neurons: Mitigating Private Data Leakage in Fine-Tuned LLMs via Joint-Embedding-Guided Pruning
ReviewPilot: A Multi-Agent System for Screening and Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.