arXiv preprint ·
Honesty is the Best Policy ... or is it? Demand Management for Probabilistic Service Options
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.21351
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
To enable well-informed customer choices and redistribute demand across service options, providers can display probabilities regarding predicted service levels at the time of booking, effectively offering probabilistic service options. In many service settings, the underlying truthful probabilities endogenously depend on the system state, rather than being static product attributes controlled by the provider. While customers rely on this information when making decisions, they cannot readily verify its accuracy. Consequently, providers may be tempted to manipulate the displayed probabilities to guide customers' choices in their favor, creating a novel lever for demand management. In this work, we model the resulting problem as a sequential decision process, define truthful probabilities recursively, and introduce transparency constraints that limit their distortion. Because the exact computation of truthful probabilities is intractable for realistic settings, we develop an adapted reinforcement learning algorithm to approximate them. Furthermore, we propose a sampling-based mixed-integer program to optimize the information communicated by the provider in each state. Our framework enables providers to gauge the benefits of dynamically disclosing probabilistic information at the time of booking and sheds light on incentives for manipulation. Our computational study is motivated by out-of-home delivery, i.e., the delivery to parcel lockers or shops, and reveals a trade-off between individual-level transparency and aggregate customer utilities.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
When is a better LLM worth paying for? Stochastic Optimization with Switching Mixed-Fidelity Oracles
ParetoChat: An LLM-Based Interface for Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization
Distributed Performance Boosting through Neural Control for Plug-and-Play Networks
Quantum-compatible Riemannian conjugate gradient for ground-state preparation
Untrained CNN and coefficient-space regularization for joint reconstruction in photoacoustic tomography
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.