arXiv preprint ·
Cross-subject decoding of imagined speech from scalp EEG: a leakage-controlled evaluation on three public corpora
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A decoder of imagined speech that works for a new user without calibration would make a non-invasive speech interface practical. We tested whether imagined-speech content recorded with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) transfers across people, and examined why accuracy within a single person remains low. Approach. We analyzed three public corpora, ds003626, KaraOne and Track 3 of the 2020 International Brain-Computer Interface Competition, under a protocol that enforces split integrity by assertion and reports exact binomial thresholds, group tests and bootstrap confidence intervals. We trained decoders on each participant and tested them on every other, compared representational geometry across participants without a classifier, applied subject-level alignment, and tested five explanations for the within-subject ceiling. Main results. Across 482 ordered pairs of participants, no pair survived correction for multiple comparisons; mean pair-transfer accuracy lay within 0.006 of chance on every corpus, while every within-subject reference lay above it. Imagery against pre-stimulus rest generalized at about 0.61 after artifact and elapsed-time controls, but its decoder labelled the interval preceding imagery as imagery as often as imagery itself, so the contrast reflects a post-stimulus state, not imagery. Within subject, only the competition corpus decoded above threshold for every participant (0.3147; chance 0.200); syllable count explained little of this, but its frequency profile failed an artifact audit. Significance. In these corpora, imagined-speech content did not transfer between people through any representation we examined. Trial count per class was the only variable that ordered the corpora, which favors larger single-condition datasets over further model development.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Signal Processing
How Long Is the Coast of a Neuron? Resolution-Dependent Interaction Order and Computational Capacity
Language Models Share a Readout Bottleneck in Working Memory
Semantic Alignment of EEG and Text: A Contrastive Learning Framework for Decoding Imagined Speech
Upper bounds on the number of causal pieces in spiking neural networks
Alignment of visual brain encoding models with individual perceptual similarity judgments
Get the few papers worth your time in Signal Processing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.