arXiv preprint ·
Feasibility Ceilings Before Learning: Sizing and Timing Bounds for Drone-Mesh Interception
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A mesh of interceptors defending a fixed site must spread over the predicted arrival point of an approaching object. This is a recurring task in multi-agent robotics: N agents, each covering a disc of radius r, spread over a probability density so that a point drawn from it falls within some agent's disc. We give closed forms for the quantities that bound performance before any policy is chosen, and validate each by Monte Carlo. The uncertainty of a point predicted by extrapolating a noisy linear track follows from least-squares variance propagation plus a delta-method term for the uncertain arrival time, agreeing with simulation to within 1.8%. The coverage probability of a packed mesh admits a closed form accurate to 0.007 absolute, with a volumetric analogue. A naive area ratio misses a ceiling: while agents stay at least 2r apart, no mesh exceeds 90.69% coverage in the plane or 74.05% in a volume. This ceiling belongs to the separation constraint, not to the problem - permitting overlap substitutes Kershner's thinnest-covering density and removes it, the better regime above a crossover at p=0.80. Hexagonal packing is optimal among five arrangements; the centroidal-Voronoi configuration coverage control supplies reaches only half its coverage at small budgets. The Gaussian assumption is conservative under heavy tails and anisotropy but fragile under bias: a one-sigma aim-point offset costs 14 points of coverage. A repositioning team must also choose a commit time, and the admissible window can be empty. Against the applicable ceiling, analytic placement attains 85% of what the configuration permits while centralised PPO averages 15% over three trainer seeds, with a paired bootstrap against a null policy containing zero at every seed. We argue such ceilings should be computed before any learning experiment and quoted alongside every result.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
Why Do Agent Teams Fail Across Boundaries? A Failure Taxonomy for Agent-to-Agent Systems with Private States
SCARCE: Emergent Institutions in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Coding Systems
When Is Smaller Greener? Right-Sizing Language Models for Agentic AI
Recursive Reward Improvement via Adversarial Meta-Prompt Evolution
AdCoEvo: A Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Advertising Delivery System
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.