arXiv preprint ·
When Do Discrete Actions Make Good Continuous Controllers?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Though modern AI models like LLMs predict discrete tokens, today's robotic foundation models represent actions as continuous vectors. In this paper, we challenge this common consensus by asking if continuous action parametrizations are superior to their discrete counterparts. We conduct an extensive comparison of single-step regression and multi-step flow variants of both continuous and discrete policies in both from-scratch single-task and multi-task VLA training, in both simulation and on real hardware. In all regimes, we find that discrete action prediction, even the most naive, uniform-bin quantization, can match or even outperform continuous-action policies in task success rate. Moreover, we find that the challenge to discrete action policies is \emph{not} action precision, but rather factorization error introduced by product-distribution predictions across time and action dimensions. We show that, when paired with the correct interventions---iterative computation through discrete flows, or distribution sharpening through classifier-free guidance---discrete flow policies can turn this weakness into a strength, enabling more responsive action changes during a predicted action chunk. Lastly, we show that attempts to explicitly inject geometric information into discrete policies, e.g. through corruption processes that emulate continuous flow matching, do \emph{not} yield consistent improvements. Taken together, our findings question existing assumptions that robotic action prediction requires distinct design decisions compared to other AI domains, and motivates the possibility of discrete action prediction as a compelling alternative to today's continuous action parametrizations. Link for the webpage \href{https://iscoyizj.github.io/discrete-action-website/}{https://iscoyizj.github.io/discrete-action-website/}
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
NavAble: A Large-Scale Dataset and Synthetic Data Generation Pipeline for Blind Navigation
RoPE-Flow: Monocular Vision-based Robot Pose Estimation via 2D Graph-Conditioned 3D Flow Matching
Probabilistic Physics Digital Twin for Human-Robot Interaction
Slip-Induced Fall Suppression During Cornering for a Remotely Operated Motorcycle with a Rear-Wheel-Swing Mechanism
VLX-Go: Robust Embodied Tracking through Multi-Stage Learning and On-Policy Refinement
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.