arXiv preprint ·
Why 3D Reconstruction Breaks Down on Under-Ice AUV Video, and How to Predict It
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reconstruction of 3D structures using under-ice AUV video footage has been inaccurate, although it is not certain whether this is due to shortcomings in the methods or an inherent deficiency of the capture system. We test four different models for reconstruction on the same Antarctic under-ice AUV video (Icefin, Kamb Ice Stream): classical feature matching SfM, differentiable photometric splatting, volumetric depth fusion, and a pose-free feed-forward foundation model. All four fail, each in a distinct way: near-total registration yielding almost no structure, geometrically broken output despite healthy photometric metrics, a persistent coverage artifact, and unstable cross-chunk scale. We show that all four are consistent with the same capture regime, a small camera-baseline-to-scene-depth ratio. Following our analysis, we propose a detection system that flags this type of failure in minutes, rather than hours of wasted compute.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
NavAble: A Large-Scale Dataset and Synthetic Data Generation Pipeline for Blind Navigation
RoPE-Flow: Monocular Vision-based Robot Pose Estimation via 2D Graph-Conditioned 3D Flow Matching
Probabilistic Physics Digital Twin for Human-Robot Interaction
Slip-Induced Fall Suppression During Cornering for a Remotely Operated Motorcycle with a Rear-Wheel-Swing Mechanism
VLX-Go: Robust Embodied Tracking through Multi-Stage Learning and On-Policy Refinement
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.