arXiv preprint ·
SKG: A Law-Induced Engine from Inference to Induction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This paper proposes the SKG (Symplectic-Kernel Gradient) reasoning engine for law-induced inference and induction. Laws are a priori; data provide instances. Inference is geometric evolution under law constraints. We organize symplectic geometry, GENERIC, kernel methods, RKHS, group-equivariant networks, and constrained mechanics into a unified, analyzable, implementable, verifiable framework. We propose the SKG octuple S = (M, g, omega, H, S, G, Delta, Pi), whose four components correspond to four levels of laws: conservation laws, constitutive relations, symmetry groups, and axiom systems. Main results: (1) Invariants enter metric construction via the Jacobian: g = J^T Sigma^-1 J + epsilon_G I. For constant cases, we establish inverse reconstruction theory: solvability rank condition (Thm 3.9), consistency criterion (Thm 3.11), and uniqueness theorem (Thm 3.14). (2) The kernel bandwidth matrix is uniquely determined by Fisher information and satisfies task-independence (Thm 3.19). (3) The metric reconstruction error decomposes into four terms (Thm 3.21), with squared condition number kappa(Sigma^*)^2 as the dominant amplification factor (Thm 3.22). (4) For state-dependent cases, we establish function-space reconstruction theory on matrix-valued RKHS (Thms 4.8, 4.9). (5) Three-layer projections handle axiom, symplectic-step, and conservation constraints. (6) The residual equation yields the observable formula, four-dimensional rank condition, and noise propagation, while g_qq is structurally unidentifiable. (7) Kernel parameterization yields the RKHS extrapolation bound (Thm 4.15) and strict OOD gain theorem in group directions (Thm 8.15). (8) The learning-decoupling theorem (Thm 9.1) proves the sole object of induction is the parameters of the task energy. Validation: 1D damped oscillator and 2D rotation-invariant system; 6 unit tests, 10 experiments (paired t-test, p < 0.01).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
TopicMerge: A Divide and Conquer Approach to Topic Modeling
Efficient Agnostic Learning of Univariate Densities Under Local Differential Privacy
Why don't Graph Transformers attend to the same token?
INCONVENIENT: A Benchmark to Assess LLM Generalization Capabilities from Convenience Samples
Counterfactual Gate-Support Decomposition: Separating Selection from Redistribution in Training-Data Filtering
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.