arXiv preprint ·
Target-Token Asymmetry Can Masquerade As Depth Specialization
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Layer-ablation studies often perturb early or late layers of a language model, compare the damage to prediction on two corpora, and read a larger early-layer effect on one corpus as early-layer specialization for its task. Such a comparison averages over the tokens that each corpus asks the model to predict, and these target tokens differ: math solutions, for example, ask for far more whitespace and numbers than encyclopedia prose. We show that this difference can create the appearance of depth specialization. We split a cross-corpus early--late damage interaction by target-token type and recompute it under a target mixture shared by both corpora. Between GSM8K and Wikitext, a positive interaction replicates across five model instances. In the three fully decomposed models, only whitespace has a positive interaction. Removing whitespace reverses the pooled effect in all three, and matching the full target mixture reverses it in two. The diagnosis holds under position matching, adversarial reassignment of token types, and a continuous readout. The risk can also be anticipated from the tokenizer alone. A screen computed before any model runs places every held-out pair it scored in the region its label predicts, and on the pairs it rates at high or medium risk, removing whitespace reverses every positive pooled estimate. A smaller content-word effect one token ahead follows the share of content targets that the unablated model already predicts. A cross-corpus depth effect therefore supports an interpretation of task specialization only after the target-token mixture is reported, the effect is decomposed by token type, and a mixture-matched summary keeps its sign.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
TopicMerge: A Divide and Conquer Approach to Topic Modeling
Learning When to Think: Utility-Guided Adaptive Reasoning for Efficient Text Retrieval
LLM-jp-4 Technical Report
INCONVENIENT: A Benchmark to Assess LLM Generalization Capabilities from Convenience Samples
Counterfactual Gate-Support Decomposition: Separating Selection from Redistribution in Training-Data Filtering
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.