arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Maliciousness: Static and Runtime Attack-Surface Profiling of Agent Skills
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agent skills are Markdown documents that a tool-using agent reads as instructions and then acts on with the privileges of the session that loaded them. Installing one grants authority (the standing to direct the agent, not new privilege), and the size of that grant is what we measure. We present a two-phase attack-surface profiling methodology that combines whole-bundle static analysis and dependency provenance checking with instrumented sandbox execution and separate model-based assessment of the resulting traces. We apply the methodology to 6,309 listings from two marketplaces, selecting listings for execution without conditioning that decision on a prior threat or risk signal. Half the corpus carries evidence of shell-execution capability; the corresponding shares are 35% for filesystem read, 31% each for filesystem write and network egress, and 13% for credential access; seven listings in ten carry at least one elevated capability. That is the surface a user accepts at install time, and almost none of it is visible then. A permission model exists but is close to inert. Authors may list the tools a skill pre-approves in its own frontmatter, which removes confirmation prompts rather than restricting what the skill can reach; of the 6,061 listings whose frontmatter parses, 770 declare anything at all, the vocabulary cannot express credential or environment access, and nothing checks what it does express against the bundle. Declaring is also not declaring accurately: 59% of declaring listings understate what their bundle can do. ClawHub declares roughly twice as often as skillsmp, yet under-declares on 88% of its declarations against 31%. Triage at the marketplace boundary therefore cannot rest on what a listing declares. It must rest on what the bundle can do. These results position capability-oriented attack-surface profiling as a necessary complement to maliciousness detection.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Enhanced Detective: A Dual-Stage Proactive Defense Against Internal Poisoning Attacks in Financial Fraud Detection Using Federated Learning
What You Sign Is Not What You Run: The Verifiability Gap in Quantized LLM Supply Chains
SkillScreen: High-Recall Screening of Malicious Agent Skills with Decision Models
Mission (Im)Possible: Towards Autonomous Discovery of Autopilot Logic Flaws in Open-Source Drone Frameworks
Same Attack, Different Judge: A First Controlled Adversarial Comparison of Jev, LLM Judges, and Purpose-Built Safety Classifiers
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.