arXiv preprint ·
Multi-Sensitive Distributional Fairness: Joint Wasserstein Audits and Shapley Allocation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Fairness audits with several sensitive attributes are often performed one coordinate at a time. This can miss purely intersectional disparities: a score may be independent of each sensitive coordinate while depending on their joint profile. We study distributional demographic parity for a real-valued score using one-dimensional Wasserstein geometry. We distinguish two complementary constructions. Conditional and sequential audits characterize joint parity through their zero sets, but their positive values do not generally decompose a fixed joint Wasserstein disparity. By contrast, full-cell conditional quantile functions define a Hilbert-valued random variable whose variance is the joint disparity. Conditional expectations of this quantile process induce a monotone information game: every reveal order yields an exact martingale decomposition of the same joint disparity, while Shapley values provide an order-free attribution across sensitive attributes. Under independent sensitive attributes, the game reduces to a Hoeffding-ANOVA decomposition and Shapley splits each interaction energy equally among its members; under dependence, orthogonality is lost and explicit formulas reveal suppression and redundancy effects that marginal audits can hide. We give fixed-grid estimators and permutation calibration, and illustrate the framework on synthetic examples and ACSIncome. The resulting framework separates three questions that are often conflated: whether joint distributional parity holds, how a fixed joint disparity decomposes along an information path, and how that disparity can be attributed across sensitive coordinates without privileging an ordering.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?
Subdata Selection for Measurement-Constrained Linear Regression under Model Misspecification
E-Backtesting Expected Shortfall without Value-at-Risk Forecasts under Time-series Models
Common Signals, Spurious Cross-Excitation, and Identification in Multivariate Hawkes Processes
Linear Regression Beyond Covariance: Latent Slope Spectra from Higher-Order Cumulants
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.