arXiv preprint ·
With Leverage, the Gambler is Not the One Who Gets Ruined
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In this note we explore the following simple question: How does the classic \emph{gambler's ruin} phenomenon change if we allow the gambler \emph{financial leverage}? We show that, with a moderate amount of leverage, it is possible for an (idealized) gambler to sustain seemingly improbable profits over a remarkably long time horizon without ever going bankrupt, \emph{even} if the gambler makes only fair bets. With a leverage ratio of $L = 10$ (less than what Lehman Brothers Holdings had from 1995--2008), the probability of multiplying one's money by $1000\times$ without going bankrupt is roughly $50\%$. More generally, given $L$-fold leverage, and given the goal of multiplying one's money by a factor of $r > 1$, the optimal gambling strategy has probability roughly $r^{-1/L}$ of success. The results in this note are designed as part of the course development for the CMU randomized algorithms course.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Data Structures & Algorithms
Sampling from the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model up to Criticality
From Global to Tail Convergence: Dynamics of $α$-Stable Score-Based Generative Models
The Singularity Has a Distribution: Exact Timing Laws and Detection Limits for a Stochastic Intelligence Explosion
Interior smoothness and zero-variance geometry for finite-maturity Heston American puts
Subgaussian Vector Balancing by an Ising Model
Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.