arXiv preprint ·
Verification Turns Capability Gaps into Routing Decisions: Small Language Models for Clinical Documentation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Clinical note generation from doctor--patient dialogue is high-volume and hallucination-intolerant: a fabricated laboratory value can create patient-safety risk, not a quality regression. We ask whether an agentic \emph{verification} architecture, rather than generator scale, can make a small language model viable here. Holding a four-evaluator verification stack and refinement policy fixed and swapping only the generator between a 4B-parameter model with a QLoRA adapter and a frontier baseline, the small model reaches $0.984$ claim-level factual entailment against $0.992$ and comes within $3.3$ points on completeness, generating entirely on-device. Its deficit is confined to \emph{inter-section structural fidelity}---arrangement rather than clinical comprehension, and the axis on which it also falls furthest below the corpus's reference notes. Because that deficit is an explicit verifier decision rather than a silent quality difference, it becomes a routing policy: run the small model by default, escalate what the verifier rejects. Measured end to end, that it achieved a similiar verified-rate acceptance to the frontier-only acceptance in this test set ($99.6\%$ vs.\ $98.4\%$ over $250$ encounters) while routing $62$, documenting three quarters without a frontier \emph{generation} call. Ablating the loop separates architecture from scale: unrefined, the small model is accepted on $26.8\%$ of encounters and the frontier model on $74.8\%$, so verification does the most work where the generator is weakest. We also contribute section-scoped refinement, which preserves unflagged sections by construction rather than instruction, and find the baseline is not uniformly stronger---its provider refused two trauma-related transcripts the on-device model handled and certified, one facet of a provider dependency a served adapter does not carry.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Foundation Models for Event Prediction Across Heterogeneous Event Logs
Generalization Analysis of Biased Stochastic Gradient Methods for Minimax Problems
YUBI-Real2Sim: 3DGS Scene Verification for Reliable Policy Evaluation
LLM-jp-4 Technical Report
Enhanced Detective: A Dual-Stage Proactive Defense Against Internal Poisoning Attacks in Financial Fraud Detection Using Federated Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.