arXiv preprint ·
Post-Training, Finetuning, and Steering:A Field Guide for Curating Training Data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
While Vision-Language-Action models have enabled impressive cross-task transfer in zero-shot settings, \emph{adaptation} methods are often necessary to achieve consistent performance on novel tasks. However, even though a wealth of methods for adaptation have been proposed, it is unclear how to choose the best method based on available trajectories. We close this gap by studying the impact of the adaptation method under a variety of common data scenarios: on- and off-policy data, offline vs online adaptation, and whether the data contains optimal or suboptimal trajectories. Our evaluation spans simulated tasks in the LIBERO suite and real tasks on a Franka platform. In the offline data regime, critic-based steering approaches outperform supervised finetuning when failure data is available. However, offline RL techniques for training critic functions fail to outperform simpler Monte-Carlo-based approaches. Finally, in the online setting, critic-based steering is significantly more sample efficient compared to policy-gradient-based finetuning methods, but has a lower performance ceiling than full finetuning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
An Optimal Algorithm for Changing from Longitudinal to Latitudinal Formation of Autonomous Aircraft Squadrons
NavAble: A Large-Scale Dataset and Synthetic Data Generation Pipeline for Blind Navigation
YUBI-Real2Sim: 3DGS Scene Verification for Reliable Policy Evaluation
Probabilistic Physics Digital Twin for Human-Robot Interaction
Box-WAM: Box Trajectories as Compact State Representations for World Action Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.