arXiv preprint ·
Why Static Skill Inconsistencies Do Not Equate to Runtime Risks: A Behavioral Analysis of LLM Agent Execution
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM agent frameworks heavily rely on external skill assets to standardize tool usage, encode operational workflows, and supply executable runtime resources. Despite their widespread adoption, multi-component skill packages frequently suffer from cross-artifact inconsistencies, where documentation, scripts, and configuration files specify conflicting behavioral constraints. Although static auditing techniques can uncover such contractual discrepancies, static defect volume cannot reliably reflect real-world agent performance degradation. This gap leaves practitioners without rigorous evidence to assess the practical risk of flawed agent skills. This paper presents a systematic empirical study to demystify the runtime implications of skill inconsistencies. We conduct large-scale auditing over 575 community and benchmark skills, yielding 1,182 manually validated contract inconsistencies. We further build a controlled evaluation pipeline with 49 executable agent tasks and three representative LLMs across NoSkill, OriginalSkill, and FixedSkill experimental settings. Through fine-grained behavioral analysis of 441 paired execution trajectories, we quantify the actual performance impacts of resolved defects.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Foundation Models for Event Prediction Across Heterogeneous Event Logs
Generalization Analysis of Biased Stochastic Gradient Methods for Minimax Problems
YUBI-Real2Sim: 3DGS Scene Verification for Reliable Policy Evaluation
LLM-jp-4 Technical Report
Enhanced Detective: A Dual-Stage Proactive Defense Against Internal Poisoning Attacks in Financial Fraud Detection Using Federated Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.