arXiv preprint ·
Learning When to Transfer: Reinforcement Learning for Carbon-Footprint Modeling in New Manufacturing Domains
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Manufacturers often need to characterize a new material, process, or product before enough operating data are available to train reliable predictive models for this new, target domain. Existing manufacturing operations contain potentially useful knowledge to accelerate this characterization, but indiscriminate reuse of data from existing source domains can cause negative transfer in learning of the new, target domain when the manufacturing domains differ sufficiently. This work proposes a reinforcement-learning method for selective knowledge transfer, where its reward scores each opportunity to transfer against supervised alternatives, so negative transfer is avoided and controlled during forward prediction instead of being diagnosed afterwards. Given limited data from a new target domain, the learned policy chooses among predictors based on individual source operations, subsets of the sources, or the supervised alternatives: fully pooled sources, or target data alone. A validation gate deploys the transferred prediction only when it improves upon the supervised alternatives. The method is designed for learning variables supporting carbon accounting, as well as performance and quality outcomes. We demonstrate the approach by quantifying the embodied greenhouse-gas emissions of parts produced via material-extrusion additive manufacturing, using data from 729 experiments spanning five materials: ABS, PETG, TPU, PLA, and recycled PLA. The response combines measured fabrication electricity with polymer-specific cradle-to-gate production factors, while 22 material, process, and toolpath features characterize each experiment. In leave-one-material-out evaluation, this method achieves a mean test RMSE of 5.2 g CO2e per part, 20.00% lower than target-only training (32.5% lower when only 5-10% of the target training data are available) and 10.30% lower than indiscriminate source-target pooling.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Foundation Models for Event Prediction Across Heterogeneous Event Logs
TopicMerge: A Divide and Conquer Approach to Topic Modeling
Merit: Making every modality earn its contribution in multimodal attention decoding
Why don't Graph Transformers attend to the same token?
CÆNL: Collapse-Based Active Neural Learning with Objective-Aligned Representation Control
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.