arXiv preprint ·
Exploring Minimal Blocking Sets for Kernelization Lower Bounds for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
For Vertex Cover, a minimal blocking set of a graph $G$ is an inclusion-wise minimal vertex set contained in no minimum vertex cover of $G$. Bougeret et al. [SIDMA 2022] showed that, for all minor-closed graph classes $\mathcal{G}$, Vertex Cover has a polynomial kernel parameterized by the distance to $\mathcal{G}$ if and only if $\mathcal{G}$ has bounded minimal blocking sets. In this work, we explore how far this connection between minimal blocking sets and kernelization extends to $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion parameterized by the deletion distance to $\mathcal{G}$. A minimal $\mathcal{F}$-blocking set of $G$ is a minimal vertex set not contained in any optimal $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion solution of $G$. For connected families $\mathcal{F}$, we show that if some graph class $\mathcal{G}$ closed under disjoint union has unbounded minimal $\mathcal{F}$-blocking sets, then $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion parameterized by the deletion distance to $\mathcal{G}$ has no polynomial kernel. This generalizes a result of Hols et al. [SIDMA 2022] for Vertex Cover. We then show that this criterion does not capture all kernelization lower bounds for $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion, even for minor-closed graph classes. Motivated by the work of Dekker and Jansen [Discrete Appl. Math. 2024], we study the more general notion of extended $\mathcal{F}$-blocking sets and the kernelization lower bounds they yield. For every fixed integer $η\geq 1$, Pw-$η$ Deletion is the problem of deleting at most $k$ vertices to reduce the pathwidth to at most $η$. We show that it has no polynomial kernel parameterized by the distance to graphs with pathwidth at most $η+1$. Moreover, for connected families $\mathcal{F}$, we show that $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Deletion parameterized by the distance to graphs with pathwidth at most $\max_{F\in\mathcal{F}} pw(F)+1$ has no polynomial kernel.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Data Structures & Algorithms
Query Complexity of Densest Sub(hyper)graph Problems
Geometric Kernel Diversity: An Axiomatic Diversity Measure in Euclidean Space
Nearly Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Fourier-Sparse Boolean Functions
Undirected Network Coding and Faster External-Memory Integer Sorting
Hitting Minors: Stronger Lower Bounds
Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.