arXiv preprint ·
Risk Measures for the Climate Transition Age: Why Symmetric Risk Budgets are unlikely to mitigate two-dimensionally asymmetric Climate Change risks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The most widely used investment risk measures - variance, standard deviation, and tracking error - treat upside deviations as equally undesirable as downside losses. In stable markets with assumed symmetric return distributions, this simplification is potentially harmless. In the climate transition age, it is not. Climate risk is two-dimensionally asymmetric, across assets and over time. Both dimensions are negatively skewed against investors. Hence, climate transition investment strategies deliberately deviate from benchmarks that reflect an insufficiently decarbonising global economy. When fiduciaries enforce tracking error budgets that penalise outperformance just as heavily as underperformance, they inadvertently constrain exactly the portfolio return opportunities that climate-aware investing seeks. We argue that replacing symmetric deviation-based risk measures with their downside-only counterparts - semi-variance, standard risk and trailing error - resolves this conflict without sacrificing any fiduciary discipline. The distinction is not merely semantic: as the gap between climate transition trajectories and market benchmarks widens over the coming decades, symmetric risk budgets will become binding constraints on transition strategies well before actual investment risk warrants it. We propose specific changes to mandate design that would allow institutional investors to pursue climate transition opportunities within genuinely risk-aware (rather than deviation-averse) frameworks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Risk Management
On integrability of local utility maximizing strategies
Data-Driven Dynamic Portfolio Selection with Vine Copula Simulation and Reinforcement Learning
Portfolio Decarbonization under Incomplete Carbon and Transition Information
Loss-versus-rebalancing with external proportional transaction costs
Reading the News Without Hindsight: NoLBERT Topics and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Get the few papers worth your time in Risk Management every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.