arXiv preprint ·
Benchmarking Self-Supervised 3D Medical Vision Foundation Models and Transferability Estimation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Self-supervised pretraining has expanded the pool of 3D medical foundation models, but published evaluations use different datasets, endpoints and fine-tuning protocols. Models also differ in architecture, pretraining objective and data, while downstream targets range from voxel-level masks to patient-level diagnoses and outcomes. As a result, published findings provide little directly comparable evidence for choosing a model for a new task. Direct comparison of adaptation performance requires fine-tuning candidates on labelled target data, at substantial computational cost. We benchmark 23 candidates across the same 14 segmentation, classification and regression tasks spanning multiple anatomies and modalities. No candidate ranked among the top three across all segmentation tasks or across all classification and regression tasks; a convolutional encoder could outperform a transformer trained with the same objective on one task but underperform it on another. We benchmark transferability estimators against the fine-tuned rankings and find that their agreement varies across dense segmentation, classification and regression. InsightRank uses task-appropriate frozen-feature statistics and architecture-aware pairwise comparisons to rank candidates before fine-tuning. Across the 23-model pool, mean Kendall tau-b was 0.431 for segmentation and 0.352 for classification and regression. The segmentation Top 3 contained a task winner on four of nine tasks; the image-level Top 3 contained none on the five tasks, despite better full-ranking agreement than the matched conventional estimators. A three-model shortlist reduced recorded extraction-plus-training job time by 85.8% across seven segmentation tasks. Together, the benchmark provides a common reference for model selection and InsightRank offers a lower-cost way to prioritize fine-tuning, with shortlist performance that differs by target type.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
CÆNL: Collapse-Based Active Neural Learning with Objective-Aligned Representation Control
SonoWorld: Towards Interactive Pose-Controllable Ultrasound World Models
Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Scene Reconstruction: Methods, Systems, and Trade-offs
NavAble: A Large-Scale Dataset and Synthetic Data Generation Pipeline for Blind Navigation
TwinPrune: Density-Aware Two-Phase Token Pruning for Vision-Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.