arXiv preprint ·
Distilling Text LMs into Speech-to-Speech LMs by Matching Internal Text Predictions
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Text language models (LMs) acquire broad linguistic and factual capabilities through large-scale pretraining, while comparable capabilities remain difficult to learn from speech alone. Recent work has shown that knowledge distillation from pretrained text LMs offers a promising way to transfer their linguistic and factual capabilities to speech models. However, existing distillation approaches have largely focused on speech-input, text-output models. This idea has yet to be explored for {\it speech-to-speech} models, which operate on both speech input and speech output. In this work we introduce a speech-to-speech pretraining method that creates an internal text interface for knowledge transfer while preserving the speech-only input and output. The model first consumes speech context without its transcription, switches to text prediction, and then uses the predicted text to lead future speech generation word by word. It also provides an interface for knowledge distillation: the internal text predictions can be directly distilled from the base text LM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of text LM distillation to a speech-to-speech LM. Under matched training conditions, the proposed sequence construction substantially improves the generative perplexity of spoken continuations over speech-only and interleaved speech-text models, approaching the performance of a text-leading inner-monologue model with external ASR prompt transcription. More importantly, distillation improves factual performance under both text and speech evaluation, indicating better retention of knowledge from the base text language model.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
PAIR: Memory-Efficient and Fast Inference with Reading--Reasoning Fusion
Everyone Was Right: Lexical Representations in Language Models Are Both Abstract and Holistic
Improving the Evaluation of Biomedical Question Answering with Few Human Preference Signals
Many Steps into One: Reasoning Contraction and the Limits of Safe Memory Reuse for LLM Agents
Of Errors and Echoes: Responsibility-Aware Credit Assignment for Tool-Use Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.