arXiv preprint ·
A Controlled Null Result for Per-Gate Riemannian Optimization in VQE
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Parametrized gates in a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) live on a product of unitary groups, which makes Riemannian optimization a natural candidate for improving training. We test this candidate in the clean per-gate setting: each single-qubit gate is optimized directly on U (2) and compared with Adam on an unconstrained Euler-angle chart representing the same physical gate, initialized from the same unitaries and tuned with a separate learning-rate sweep. On a validated hydrogen-chain benchmark, we find no measurable practical advantage from the Riemannian machinery. The direct manifold optimizer and the Euler-coordinate baseline are interleaved in final error and success rate; the classical coordinate baseline is not slower in iterations on the successful cells; and the choices of Riemannian metric, retraction, and momentum vector transport do not change the conclusion. We also identify four failure modes that can manufacture an apparent positive result: a trivial product-state benchmark, a projected-matrix Adam baseline that discards most of its own step, a non-unitary inherited Cayley retraction that lets the reported energy pass below the variational minimum, and a learning-rate grid whose optimum sits at its boundary. Each failure mode produced a plausible multi-seed result in our own workflow before being caught. The practical output of this paper is therefore a controlled null result and a validation checklist for VQE optimizer comparisons.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
A Mean Field Model of Consumption Inertia and Keeping Up with the Joneses
Convex-Analytic View of Query Selection for Safety Verification of Markov Decision Processes
Online Submodular Welfare Maximization: Computation is not the Bottleneck
Risk-Averse Inference-Time Diffusion Model Alignment with Finite-Sample Guarantees
Exploration strategies for Gaussian process bandit optimization with inference regret guarantees
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.