arXiv preprint ·
Thinking Outside the Bots: Human Ideas in AI's Semantic Blind Spots Are Not Inferior
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
AI-generated outputs are frequently perceived as highly creative, but also tend to be more similar to each other (homogenized) than human ideas. Does the human heterogeneity that extends beyond AI reflect valuable thinking that AI misses? Alternatively, is greater human heterogeneity driven by lower-quality ideas and less effective thinking that AI avoids? We developed Expansion of Divergent Generative Expression (EDGE) to map AI's semantic "blind spots" by assessing how strongly/weakly individual human ideas were represented in a task-matched AI semantic comparison set. Specifically, we compared human-generated vs. AI-generated ideas across three open-ended tasks: college admissions essays, alternative uses for everyday objects, and interpersonal advice. Across all three tasks, human responses extended into semantic regions sparsely covered by AI outputs. These distinctively human responses showed no meaningful deficits in creativity, quality, or effectiveness, were associated with equal-or-better academic performance, and with credibly superior ratings and achievement for some outcomes. These ideas were thus not merely poor-performing variation; they performed as well as or better than ideas that overlapped more strongly with AI ideas. More distinctive human ideas tended to receive higher creativity ratings, but this relationship was weak or reversed for AI ideas. Taken together, these results suggest that differentiation among human-generated ideas does not reflect poor thinking that AI can safely omit, and instead may afford both individual and population-level advantages.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
AI Representations of Mental Health Stigma: Quantifying the Gap Between AI Estimations and Human Perceptions Across Gender Groups Using GPT-Based LLMs
Towards Green AI: Evaluating Energy Efficiency for Quantized LLM Inference
Beyond Single-Pathogen Forecasts: Predicting Shared Respiratory Hospital Burden from Influenza, COVID-19, and RSV
A null model to detect coordinated online behavior integrating evidence from multiple indicators
{Access|Use|Sustain|_}-ability: Exploration and Quantification of a Linguistic Structure and Its Use in HCI
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.