arXiv preprint ·
UZHCL_for_the_win at Touche: Encoder Fine-Tuning, Synthetic Augmentation, and an Underpowered Encoder-LLM Comparison
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Online discussions on platforms like Reddit are a productive testbed for fallacy detection: short texts, broad topical range, and the full inventory of informal fallacies. The Touche 2026 lab at CLEF formalises this as a shared task on a Reddit-derived corpus that combines fallacy detection with argument-scheme classification. This paper describes our participation in all three subtasks (ST1 binary fallacy detection, ST2 eight-way fallacy classification, ST3 four-way argument-scheme classification) and both evaluation tracks. Our submitted systems are fine-tuned RoBERTa-large encoders with task-specific heads, augmented with a small batch of LLM-generated synthetic contrastive pairs; for ST2 and ST3 on the enhanced track we additionally added confidence-filtered pseudo-labelled examples from the unlabelled pool. A wider backbone comparison spanning additional encoders (DeBERTa-v3, ModernBERT) and an LLM track (four Qwen variants from 3B to 32B, zero-shot through CoT-LoRA) showed no validated benefit over RoBERTa-large at this corpus scale, with 5-fold variance wide enough that we call the comparison underpowered rather than settled. We also characterise how much of the enhanced track's lift reflects organiser-rewritten inputs carrying label information rather than genuine argument clarification. On the official Touche 2026 test set our systems ranked first on both base-track classification cells (ST2 and ST3) and second on both binary-detection (ST1) tracks, with the two enhanced-track classification cells topped by cascaded and multitask systems. We close with the rare-class limitation on ST3 and the most useful follow-ups. Code: https://github.com/psychias/fallacy_detection_clef_2026
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
PAIR: Memory-Efficient and Fast Inference with Reading--Reasoning Fusion
Everyone Was Right: Lexical Representations in Language Models Are Both Abstract and Holistic
Improving the Evaluation of Biomedical Question Answering with Few Human Preference Signals
Many Steps into One: Reasoning Contraction and the Limits of Safe Memory Reuse for LLM Agents
Of Errors and Echoes: Responsibility-Aware Credit Assignment for Tool-Use Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.