arXiv preprint ·
Mean Accuracy Is the Wrong Estimand for a Release Decision
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A release decision about a fine-tuned model is an operational commitment about the \emph{next} rerun of its training recipe. Yet standard benchmark reporting gives only the mean accuracy of past seeds. These target fundamentally different questions: release decisions depend on catastrophic tail risk, whereas standard evaluation reports only central tendency. Because fine-tuning induces bimodal mode collapse, high average accuracy frequently conceals severe failure rates. Auditing $2\,124$ fine-tuned models across eleven language models, we show that shipping models based on mean accuracy violates a $10\%$ deployment failure budget $48.0\%$ of the time. Common heuristics like $\bar b - 2σ$ prove equally dangerous: by underestimating variance on small samples, they become most permissive when evidence is weakest. We introduce \textbf{recipe cards}, an evaluation framework that directly certifies rerun tail failure rates using exact finite-sample binomial bounds. Recipe cards reduce held-out budget violations to $0.6\%$, enforce a mathematical sample floor ($N \ge 22$) that prevents certification on thin evidence, and explicitly refuse unverified claims under domain and task shifts.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
A 4-Qubit Variational Quantum Classifier for Sequence-Specific Classification of DNMT3A and DNMT3B Flanking Methylation Preferences
Foundation Models for Event Prediction Across Heterogeneous Event Logs
Improving the Evaluation of Biomedical Question Answering with Few Human Preference Signals
Merit: Making every modality earn its contribution in multimodal attention decoding
Certified Robustness via Sparse Second-Order Cone Relaxations
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.