arXiv preprint ·
On the Calibration of Crowdsourcing Aggregators
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Calibration has been extensively studied for classifiers, but remains largely unexplored for crowdsourcing aggregation methods, which are increasingly used for making probabilistic decisions. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first theoretical and empirical study of calibration in label aggregation. To our great surprise, we find that widely used aggregation methods can be severely miscalibrated, and in opposite directions: Majority Vote is underconfident while model-based aggregators are overconfident. We prove that the Bayesian aggregator is perfectly calibrated under its data-generating model. We also show that exact calibration of weighted majority votes requires highly restrictive conditions, which helps explain why Majority Vote is generally miscalibrated in realistic crowds. Empirically, we study calibration across $39$ human crowdsourcing datasets and LLM-based crowds. In both cases, we observe systematic miscalibration for aggregation models such as Majority Vote, Dawid--Skene, GLAD, and CrowdFM. Finally, we propose a post-hoc calibration procedure that \emph{aggregates the aggregators}: for any aggregation function $φ$, we introduce a transformation that first combines its predictive distribution with those of complementary aggregators, before applying temperature scaling. This simple and interpretable transformation makes temperature scaling more effective than when applied directly to $φ$. It improves calibration, especially in the high-redundancy regime where there are many annotations per item, while generally preserving or even improving accuracy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
Limit Theory for Online Expectile Estimation under Short and Long Range Dependence
Risk-Averse Inference-Time Diffusion Model Alignment with Finite-Sample Guarantees
A Nonlinear Time-Series Theory for Constant-step SGD with Momentum
textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?
Backward Conformal Prediction under Covariate Shift
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.