arXiv preprint ·
Neural Estimation of Irreversibility in Real and Simulated Limit Order Book Paths
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3858063.3858900
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A path indistinguishable from its own reverse carries no arrow of time, so time irreversibility is a necessary condition for a directed mechanism to be readable from trajectories alone. In finance it has been measured only on scalar series such as returns and volatility. We define the irreversibility rate of a coarse-grained limit order book path as the forward-to-reverse log-density ratio per event, and estimate it from three weeks of Nasdaq market-by-order data with an order-invariant MLP and a temporal convolutional network that receive identical blocks. For NVDA, the order-invariant and order-sensitive estimates are 0.036 and 0.054 nats per event, respectively. Their difference, the ordering increment, is 0.018. A surrogate preserving the coarse one-step transition table recovers 30 percent less irreversibility than the observed paths. The increment is positive for all twelve symbols on every held-out daytime date, and for NVDA in each session window. It changes more than tenfold with the coarse-graining scale. Neither a linear score nor any single feature group reproduces the full fitted rate. A queue-reactive simulator calibrated on the same days matches the market's ordered rate, 0.052 against 0.054, yet its ordering increment is 0.0006 against 0.018, building temporal asymmetry out of block composition instead of block order. We propose the ordering and scale profile of path irreversibility as a benchmark for order book simulators. Code and audit materials are available at https://github.com/hjyeo30/lob-irreversibility.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Trading & Market Microstructure
StochLOB: Heavy-Tailed Score Matching for Robust Limit Order Book Trend Prediction
Demand Under a Mechanical Price: Elasticity and Welfare in Ethereum's Data-Availability Market
NEST: Stale-Robust Tokenized-Stock Measurement for a Crypto-Treasury LETF Stack
Do Rollups Self-Organize? Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the EIP-4844 Blob Fee Market
How Much Screening Buys a Second? Speed, Selection, and the Maker's Spread
Get the few papers worth your time in Trading & Market Microstructure every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.