arXiv preprint ·
Security in LLM-Assisted Coding: A Systematic Literature Review
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large Language Models accelerate software development but introduce severe security vulnerabilities. This systematic review investigates security risks in automated coding, benchmark limitations, and the role of human developers. Findings indicate that models frequently generate insecure code and faulty patches due to training data biases. Additionally, the models themselves are susceptible to direct attacks. Current evaluation methods suffer from data contamination and lack robust security metrics. Consequently, human oversight remains essential. Safer integration of automation will require more security-aware model architectures, stronger security-specific benchmarks, and more effective human-AI collaboration frameworks to mitigate these systemic risks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Accuracy and Uncertainty in Machine Deception Detection (Research White Paper)
Adversarial Robustness of Camera-Radar Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving
From Acoustic Sensing to Physical Actions: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Risks in Edge-Deployed Audio LLM-Based Agents
When Agents Talk, Secrets Travel: Topology-Driven Leakage and Recipient-Conditioned Sanitization in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
ATTCK-R: Knowledge-Aware Long-Horizon Jailbreaking for Protected LLMs
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.