arXiv preprint ·
Persistent LLM Orchestration of Heterogeneous Robot Teams via Partial Delegation to Multi-Agent Protocols
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15224
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Natural language specifications let non-expert users task robot teams, and large language models (LLMs) have recently proven effective at grounding such semantic specifications into plans for heterogeneous teams. Existing approaches assume missions that terminate and environments that, while unknown, do not change, but both assumptions fail in many emerging applications. For example, a disaster-response mission does not terminate, and its environment changes continuously as hazards spread and evacuees move. We identify three ways an LLM orchestrator breaks in this setting: its prompt grows without bound, its reasoning degrades as agents and targets accumulate, and it stops actively monitoring after covering the search space once. We build on the successful framework of grounded generative intelligence, and address each issue with a classical idea. A Markovian state summary, rebuilt from the semantic map at every invocation, replaces the growing interaction history. Partial delegation lets the orchestrator assign a subset of robots to an autonomous multi-agent protocol and reserve its reasoning for generating subtasks that require detailed parameters and careful ordering. Lastly, observation staleness, surfaced explicitly in the prompt, together with task-and event-triggered re-prompting, keeps the team vigilant. In a simulated urban search-and-rescue mission with spreading fire and moving evacuees, our framework rescues 98% of civilians versus 89% for the strongest baseline while using six times fewer tokens. Additional ablations isolate the contribution of each mechanism.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
Jevolution: A Framework for Studying Communication and Collective Dynamics in AI Agents
Do Rollups Self-Organize? Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the EIP-4844 Blob Fee Market
What Counts as the Same Task? Executable Contracts for Robustness Evaluation of Tool-Using Agents
CoLA: Multi-VLA Coordination via Learned Adapters
Optimize Once, Execute Fast: Latency-Aware Multi-Agent Workflow Learning for Recurrent Queries
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.