arXiv preprint ·
What Really Works for Universal Multimodal Embeddings? A Controlled Study of Contrastive Training Strategies
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Contrastive learning has become the standard paradigm for multimodal representation learning, aligning semantically matched pairs while separating mismatched ones in a shared embedding space. Although various contrastive training strategies have been proposed across negative selection, batch construction, and gradient modulation, their actual effectiveness under controlled, reproducible conditions remains poorly understood. This motivates a fundamental question: Do sophisticated contrastive strategies consistently bring meaningful downstream gains in multimodal embedding learning? To address this, we systematically evaluate representative strategies under a unified benchmarking framework on MMEB. Surprisingly, direct evaluations reveal that most existing strategies offer marginal gains over a standard aligned baseline, with several even degrading overall performance. To uncover the underlying failure modes, we introduce an MLLM-as-a-Judge diagnostic framework that dissects top-1 retrieval behaviors into labeled positives, false negatives (unlabeled valid matches), and hard/easy negative errors. Our systematic analysis yields three key insights: (1) Gradient distortion: Upweighting gradients from high-similarity negatives consistently hurts downstream generalization; (2) Distribution illusion: Wider separation between positive and negative similarity distributions does not necessarily translate to better retrieval performance; and (3) Synergistic training: While false-negative mitigation or hard-batch construction yields limited gains in isolation, integrating hard-negative mining, false-negative mitigation, and hard-batch construction achieves optimal performance, delivering an average improvement of 6.0% on MMEB with Qwen2-VL-2B. Overall, our findings demystify popular contrastive strategies and provide actionable recipes for training universal multimodal embedding models.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Design Choices for Multimodal Transformer Learning with Missing and Longitudinal Healthcare Data
Automated carotid artery atherosclerotic inflammation segmentation in PET using MSR-Net
SceneForesee: Learning Scene Evolution for Spatiotemporal Reasoning
GeoBridge: Evolving Transferable Decoder Topologies for Geometric Vision
FreeCHROMA: Generative Chroma Keying from Unaligned Background References
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.