arXiv preprint ·
EAIR: Interaction Risks in Enterprise LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.14800
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
LLM agents increasingly divide enterprise work across roles with different goals, authority, access, and information. Because each agent often sees only a local snapshot of the enterprise workflow, locally reasonable actions can still violate organization-wide constraints (e.g., several service agents can each issue credit that is individually permitted while collectively exceeding a shared compensation cap). We introduce EAIR, the first framework for analyzing enterprise multi-agent interaction risks. We make four contributions. (1) We formalize enterprise interaction risk in terms of the organizational properties that workflow operations must preserve, and operationalize this formulation as a taxonomy of testable risks with explicit failure criteria and evidence requirements. (2) We build EAIR-Worlds, a suite of executable micro-worlds that instantiates selected risks as controlled, observable workflows with explicit roles, policies, permissions, source facts, and execution traces. (3) We develop a novel diagnosis-and-repair pipeline that uses the resulting execution traces to locate contributing interaction boundaries, guide targeted workflow repairs, and retest the repaired system. (4) Large-scale experiments show recurring interaction failures across the organizational properties studied. Together, EAIR is the first operational framework for diagnosing and mitigating enterprise multi-agent interaction failures.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
Jevolution: A Framework for Studying Communication and Collective Dynamics in AI Agents
Do Rollups Self-Organize? Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the EIP-4844 Blob Fee Market
What Counts as the Same Task? Executable Contracts for Robustness Evaluation of Tool-Using Agents
CoLA: Multi-VLA Coordination via Learned Adapters
Optimize Once, Execute Fast: Latency-Aware Multi-Agent Workflow Learning for Recurrent Queries
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.