arXiv preprint ·
DICE: Tilting the Odds through Interface Attackson System One Model
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
System One models offer typed judgments that applications can turn into decisions. Their answers, however, are conditional on the state and question supplied by surrounding components, and on how the application uses the response. We study this boundary in a Jev-based pipeline with bounded substitutions at three adapter outputs: state extraction, question generation, and output interpretation. Across three small synthetic studies, each adapter can change the final decision while Jev and its authentic API responses remain outside attacker control. The cases expose distinct failures of source fidelity, answer meaning, and response relevance. Checks that bind these relationships stopped the corresponding interventions we tested, although source verification also rejected some valid clean decisions. The pilot identifies where correct request-level judgments can lose their connection to the original task; it does not estimate the prevalence of these failures in deployed systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
ByteMark: A Unified Byte-Level Watermark for Detection Across Language Models
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
MemForm: Benchmarking Memory Formation Poisoning in LLM Agents
Vulnerable Models in the AI Supply Chain: An Empirical Study of Adoption, Propagation, and Usage Patterns
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.