arXiv preprint ·

TraceSampler: Making Sampling Errors Predictable and Correctable for Accelerated Generative Sampling

George Matthew, Guoqiang Zhang and Kenta Niwa

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computer VisionArtificial Intelligence

Abstract

Accurate sampling from continuous-time generative models can require many model evaluations. Low-step sampling reduces cost, but coarse updates introduce endpoint errors that can accumulate and degrade generation quality. We introduce TraceSampler, a post-training method that corrects these errors without modifying the pretrained model. Rather than optimising low-step updates directly, TraceSampler models endpoint error as a sample-specific prediction problem. A higher-step reference integration over the same interval provides the supervised target, while a compact representation makes high-dimensional error predictable from the sampling trace. This representation combines shared residual structure, trace-derived directions, and a low-rank remainder, so shallow per-step MLP heads predict sample-dependent coefficients. These coefficients drive a two-stage learned residual correction: the first stage predicts the full endpoint residual, while an intermediate backbone evaluation provides new trace information to predict the remaining residual; this evaluation is reused by the following step. TraceSampler is evaluated with Rectified Flow on CIFAR-10, SiT-XL/2 on ImageNet-256, and SD3.5 Medium for text-to-image generation. At 10 steps, it reduces trajectory MSE relative to matched-step Euler by 90.5% on CIFAR-10 and 85.6% on ImageNet-256, while achieving FID scores of 2.692 and 2.189, close to 120-step Heun references of 2.601 and 2.056 with 24$\times$ fewer backbone evaluations. On SD3.5 Medium, TraceSampler improves image quality and prompt following; at 10 steps, ImageReward rises from 0.752 to 0.906 while trajectory MSE falls by 70.7%. These gains preserve Euler's backbone-evaluation budget, add less than 0.4% inference FLOPs, and incur negligible wall-clock overhead, showing that coarse-step sampling error can be made predictable from the sampling trace and efficiently corrected.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computer Vision

Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics