arXiv preprint ·
Agreement versus Softmax under Spatial Disambiguation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
ScanRefer Multiple queries require spatial disambiguation: several instances of the target class are present, and the referencer must pick one. When per-query logits were never logged, a common substitute is cross-epoch agreement. On the full ScanRefer validation set (9,508 queries; GeoClassifier with ground-truth proposals), object-level softmax is similarly miscalibrated on Unique and Multiple (ECE 0.068 vs. 0.102; the scene-bootstrap gap interval includes zero). Fixed-final agreement on the same checkpoints reports ECE 0.041 vs. 0.272 (gap +0.231). Modal-vote agreement is 0.045 vs. 0.318. Most Multiple errors are same-class wrong-instance (45.6%); geometric miss (H2) is 59.6%, and wrong-category (H1) is 16.7%. A non-monotone H1 pattern does not appear under the default fixed-final protocol, and we retract it. Logit-free thresholds rank spatially hard queries poorly. If only agreement was logged, calibrate abstention on Multiple and report wrong-instance rates with H1.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Structure-Aware Matching for Robust UAV Thermal-to-Satellite Geo-Localization
Design Choices for Multimodal Transformer Learning with Missing and Longitudinal Healthcare Data
APEX: Asynchronous Prefix Denoising for Extreme Compression
SceneForesee: Learning Scene Evolution for Spatiotemporal Reasoning
CaptchaAgent: Verifiable Visual Reasoning for CAPTCHA Solving
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.