arXiv preprint ·
Culture in the Code: Anthropological Concepts Decoding AI's Hidden Assumptions
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1007/s43681-026-01122-2
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Contemporary AI development operates on foundational assumptions about intelligence, rationality, and human values that reflect narrow cultural perspectives, limiting alternative conceptions of how AI can be globally beneficial. This paper introduces seven anthropological concepts -- origin story, monoculture, thick description, personhood and community, cargo cult, structuralism, and liminality -- to expose hidden assumptions and offer alternative frameworks for understanding AI alignment. The paper examines how AI systems embody Western-centric notions of rationality as utility optimization, personhood as bounded individuals, and values as quantifiable preferences extracted from behavior. The concepts surface three assumptions that current alignment debates rarely examine: that values can be inferred from behavior, quantified, and formalized; that such quantified values capture what actually matters; and that values, once defined with sufficient precision, are appropriate optimization targets. Against "thin alignment" -- optimization for behavioral proxies stripped of context -- the paper proposes directions toward "thick alignment": recognizing that values emerge through social practice rather than existing as extractable properties; defining more appropriate metrics that capture not only end goals but the conditions that lead to long-term flourishing; and moving from models of fixed identity toward relational ontologies where personhood emerges through social participation. The paper concludes that if AI systems are to create conditions conducive to human flourishing rather than optimize metrics that flatten social experiences, three shifts are needed: redistributing interpretive sovereignty to affected communities, protecting what resists optimization, and extending accountability across generations.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
Evaluating Bias in Chinese Large Language Models across Tasks and Registers: Task Operationalization Effects and Irony Classification Risks
Beyond the Monolithic Interface: A Research Agenda for Plural Conversational AI
Fine-Tuning Strategy, Not Just Data: A Statistically Rigorous Audit of Gender and Stereotypical Bias in Embedding Models for HR Recommendation Systems
Les Misérables Dialogue: A film-based network representation of social communication
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.