arXiv preprint ·
A Better Metric Will Not Save You: What You Compare Beats How You Compare It
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Representational similarity measures (RSA, CKA, Procrustes) are chosen for the transformations they treat as irrelevant, and all of them take the set of conditions as given. That set is fixed by two decisions, which inputs are admitted and how they are grouped, both taken before the matrix a measure operates on exists: no invariance property reaches them. We measure what they are worth where the arrangement the conditions ought to have is known independently of the systems compared, the acoustic organisation of vowels, across fifteen languages and twenty-seven representations. Changing which categories are compared, at a fixed number of them, moves the gap between two representations by more than twice the effect being measured, while changing how many moves it not at all. In this setting rankings of models are identified under these choices, and rankings across languages are not.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded Tasks
Scaling Laws for Multimodal Data Mixtures
COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering
MemForm: Benchmarking Memory Formation Poisoning in LLM Agents
Fear Is Not Always Fear: Variation in Emotion Label Equivalence Across Datasets
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.